₦7.1b Fraud Trial: EFCC to appeal court ruling on Orji Kalu - Global Report

Breaking

Diaspora Banking

Diaspora Banking
Diaspora

Uba banner

Uba banner
Uba

virtual account banner ad

access banner

ahttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1LcMn-nAFN9eW_IgmPFaWvPxfRznlHxwI/view?usp=drivesdk lt="test banner" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TswaFT8_0oE/YIQpUnaVR6I/AAAAAAAABz8/vLPnZ_VoNQ0PVb6Mr04jkZ7HeR3ZzefyACK4BGAYYCw/s1600/IMG-20210424-WA0026.jpg"/>

Skillnovation

Skillnovation
WEMA/FG

Skillnovation

Skillnovation
WEMA/FG

Thursday, September 30, 2021

₦7.1b Fraud Trial: EFCC to appeal court ruling on Orji Kalu

 


Senator Kalu

 

Nigeria – The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has said it will appeal the ruling today by Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court stopping the Commission from retrying a former governor of Abia State, Senator Orji Uzor Kalu.

Kalu was serving a 12-year jail term for N7.1billion fraud when the Supreme Court, ruling on an appeal by Kalu’s co-defendant, Ude Udeogu, on 8 May 2020, nullified the proceedings leading to their conviction.

The Supreme Court had ordered a retrial at the Federal High Court. But kalu who profited from the ruling to secure release from Kuje Correctional Centre, filed an application before the Federal High Court in Abuja to stop his retrial.

Ruling on the application on Wednesday, September 29, 2021, Justice Ekwo, granted the ex-governor’s request on the grounds that the apex court’s judgment did not order the retrial of Kalu and that by virtue of Section 36 (9) of the 1999 constitution as amended, or Section 283 (2) of the ACJA (Administration of Criminal Justice Act), “no person can be retried on the offence upon which he has been convicted”.

In a statement issued by by its spokesperson, Wilson Uwujaren, EFCC believes the judge erred in this ruling as Section 36(9) of the 1999 constitution is applicable only where the previous judgment was by a court of competent jurisdiction.

“In this case, the apex court had in the said judgment described the process that led to the conviction of Kalu as a nullity because the Judge came from the Court of Appeal to decide the matter”, Uwujaren said.

The Commission further averred that the court erred in its ruling that the Supreme Court did not order the retrial of Kalu; “that it amounts to cherry-picking for Kalu to profit from the decision of the Apex court nullifying the conviction of his co defendant, Ude Udeagu but is not prepared to face the burden of retrial”, EFCC said.

No comments:

Post a Comment